Skip to main content

How-To Guides, RevOps

How to Choose an AI Automation Tool

By Woody Klemetson, CEO & Co-founder·Last updated: February 5, 2026·17 min read
Checklist for choosing the right AI workflow automation tool for revenue teams

How do you choose the right AI workflow automation tool?

To choose the right AI workflow automation tool, evaluate candidates across five dimensions: automation depth, CRM integration quality, data accuracy, stack compatibility, and total cost of ownership. The most important question is whether the tool provides insights (analysis you still have to act on) or automation (actions taken for you). Most teams complete this evaluation in 30-60 days.

Revenue teams are overwhelmed with tool options. According to MarketsandMarkets, 68% of sales leaders struggle with tool overlap and data silos—often because they bought tools without a clear framework for evaluation.

This guide gives you a practical, step-by-step checklist for choosing an AI workflow automation tool that actually fits your team. No hype, no vendor rankings—just the questions you should ask before signing a contract.


What do you need before evaluating tools?

Before evaluating any tools, you need three things: a clear picture of your current workflow pain, access to your CRM and tech stack details, and buy-in from at least one stakeholder who owns the budget. Without these, you'll evaluate tools in a vacuum and end up with something that doesn't fit.

Requirements:

  • A documented list of manual tasks your team does daily (CRM updates, handoffs, follow-ups)
  • Access to your CRM admin settings (HubSpot or Salesforce) to evaluate integration depth
  • A rough budget range approved by leadership

Optional but helpful:

  • Call volume data (how many calls per rep per week)
  • A time audit showing how many hours reps spend on non-selling tasks
  • Input from sales, CS, and RevOps on their biggest pain points

Step 1: How do you define your workflow bottleneck?

Start by identifying the specific manual task that costs your team the most time. Don't evaluate tools until you know what problem you're solving. The most common bottlenecks for revenue teams are: CRM data entry after calls, sales-to-CS handoffs, follow-up task management, and pipeline hygiene.

Ask your team these questions:

  • Where do reps spend the most time on non-selling activities?
  • What data is consistently missing or stale in your CRM?
  • Which handoffs between teams break most often?
  • What manual processes would you eliminate first if you could?

The answers will narrow your search:

BottleneckWhat you needTop tools to evaluate
CRM data entry after callsPost-call automationAskElephant, HubSpot AI
Sales-to-CS handoffsAutomated handoff documentsAskElephant
Follow-up task managementAuto task creationAskElephant, Salesforce Einstein
Pipeline visibility / forecastingDeal intelligenceAskElephant, Clari, Gong
Rep coaching at scaleConversation analyticsAskElephant, Gong, Chorus

Pro tip: Ask reps, not managers. Managers often underestimate the admin burden because they don't do it themselves.


Step 2: How do you separate insight tools from automation tools?

The most important distinction in AI workflow tools is insight vs. automation. Insight tools analyze data and tell you what happened. Automation tools take action based on that data. Most revenue teams need automation first—it delivers faster ROI because it doesn't require behavior change.

Here's the practical difference:

CapabilityInsight Tools (Gong, Chorus)Automation Tools (AskElephant)
Call recordingYesYes
Transcription and summariesYesYes
Coaching scorecardsYes (advanced)Yes
Writes to CRM fields automaticallyNoYes
Creates follow-up tasksNoYes
Generates handoff documentsNoYes
Requires reps to update CRM manuallyYesNo

If your biggest problem is that reps won't update the CRM, an insight tool won't fix it—it gives reps more information to ignore. Automation removes the human from the loop.

If your biggest problem is that managers can't see what's happening on calls, an insight tool may be the right starting point.

Many teams eventually use both. But start with the one that addresses your primary bottleneck from Step 1.

Related: Why action outperforms insight


Step 3: How do you check CRM integration depth?

Not all CRM integrations are equal. The critical question is whether the tool writes structured data directly to your CRM fields, or just logs activities and attaches transcripts. This distinction determines whether your pipeline data actually improves.

Here's a quick test. Ask every vendor these four questions, then compare how the major tools stack up:

  1. "Does your tool write to custom CRM fields based on call content?" — If the answer is "we sync notes" or "we log activities," that's not field-level automation. You still need reps to transfer insights manually.

  2. "Which specific fields does it update?" — Look for deal stage, next steps, budget, timeline, decision-makers, and custom fields. Generic "call logged" entries don't help pipeline accuracy.

  3. "Does it update in real-time or batch?" — Real-time matters for pipeline reviews and forecasting.

  4. "Does it work with custom objects and fields in our CRM?" — Standard field support is table stakes. Custom field support is where real automation value lives.

Here's how the major tools answer these questions:

CRM Integration TestAskElephantGongClariFireflies
Writes to custom CRM fields from callsYesNoNoNo
Updates deal stage, next steps, qualification dataYesNo (manual)No (manual)No
Real-time updates (within minutes)YesN/AN/AActivity log only
Custom object and field supportYesLimitedLimitedNo

AskElephant writes directly to HubSpot and Salesforce fields—including custom fields—within minutes of call completion. Most call analytics tools stop at activity logging. This is the difference between "a call happened" and "here's exactly what was discussed and what needs to happen next."

Related: How to automate CRM updates from sales calls


Step 4: How do you evaluate data accuracy and trust?

AI output is only useful if it's accurate enough to trust in your CRM. Before committing to any tool, test its output against human judgment on at least 20-30 calls. If the AI gets key details wrong more than 10% of the time, it will create more problems than it solves.

Here's how to test accuracy:

1. Run a parallel test. Have reps manually update the CRM after 20-30 calls. Simultaneously, let the AI tool process the same calls. Compare the outputs field by field.

2. Check for hallucination. Does the AI invent details that weren't discussed? This is the fastest way to destroy trust. Flag any instance where the AI writes data that doesn't match the actual conversation.

3. Evaluate edge cases. Test with poor audio quality, multiple speakers, heavy accents, and calls where the prospect is vague. These reveal whether the AI handles real-world conditions.

4. Ask about the AI model. Is it a general-purpose LLM, or has it been fine-tuned for sales conversations? Purpose-built models tend to perform better on domain-specific tasks.

Pro tip: Accuracy matters more than features. A tool that accurately updates 5 fields is more valuable than one that claims to update 20 fields but gets half of them wrong.


Step 5: How do you map the tool to your existing stack?

Before buying, confirm the tool integrates natively with every system in your daily workflow: CRM, calendar, video platform, communication tools, and project management. Every integration gap creates a manual workaround—which defeats the purpose of automation.

Use this checklist, then compare how the major tools match up:

SystemQuestion to Ask
CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce)Native integration or third-party sync? Field-level or activity-level?
Video (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet)Auto-joins calls or requires manual invite?
Calendar (Google, Outlook)Auto-detects meetings or manual scheduling?
Communication (Slack)Sends real-time alerts and summaries?
Task Management (Asana, Linear, monday.com)Creates tasks automatically?

Here's how the major tools compare on native integration coverage:

IntegrationAskElephantGongClariChorusFireflies
HubSpot (field-level)YesActivity onlyNoActivity onlyActivity only
Salesforce (field-level)YesActivity onlyYes (forecast)Activity onlyActivity only
ZoomYesYesYesYesYes
Microsoft TeamsYesYesYesYesYes
Google MeetYesYesLimitedYesYes
Slack (real-time alerts)YesLimitedYesLimitedYes

Native integrations are always better than third-party connectors (Zapier, etc.). Third-party connectors add latency, cost, and failure points. If your stack doesn't match a tool's integration list, that's a disqualifier—not a "nice to have."

Related: Modern RevOps software stack for fast-growing startups


Step 6: How do you run a 30-day proof of concept?

The best way to evaluate an AI automation tool is a structured 30-day pilot with a small team (3-5 reps). Define success metrics before you start, measure weekly, and compare before-and-after data. Never buy based on a demo alone.

Here's a pilot framework that works:

Week 0 (before pilot): Capture baseline metrics.

  • Average time reps spend on CRM updates per day
  • Percentage of CRM fields filled after calls
  • Number of overdue follow-up tasks
  • Pipeline accuracy (forecast vs. actual)

Weeks 1-4 (during pilot): Run the tool alongside your current process.

  • Track the same metrics weekly
  • Collect qualitative feedback from pilot reps
  • Note any integration issues or data accuracy problems

Week 5 (after pilot): Compare results.

  • Did CRM completion rates improve?
  • Did reps save measurable time?
  • Was the data accurate enough to trust?
  • Did managers notice better pipeline visibility?

Decision criteria: If the tool measurably improves at least two of your baseline metrics and reps don't hate using it, it's worth buying. If it doesn't move the needle in 30 days, it won't in 90.


Step 7: How do you calculate total cost of ownership?

Look beyond the sticker price. Total cost of ownership includes the subscription, implementation time, training, ongoing maintenance, and—critically—the cost of inaction. A $99/month tool that saves 100 hours/month of admin work is dramatically cheaper than doing nothing.

Here's a TCO framework:

Cost CategoryWhat to Include
SubscriptionPer-user or flat rate, annual vs. monthly
ImplementationSetup time, CRM configuration, field mapping
TrainingOnboarding reps and managers
MaintenanceOngoing admin, field updates, new hire setup
Cost of inactionRep hours spent on manual work × hourly rate

Here's how the major tools compare on pricing:

ToolPricing ModelEstimated CostSeat Minimums
AskElephantFlat rateStarting at $99/monthNo
GongPer user/year~$1,000-2,000/user/yearYes
ClariEnterprise contract~$160k+/yearYes
Chorus (ZoomInfo)BundledContact salesYes
Fireflies.aiPer user/monthFree to $19/user/monthNo

Example ROI calculation:

A 15-person sales team, each spending 30 minutes daily on CRM updates:

  • 7.5 hours/day of lost selling time
  • 150 hours/month
  • At $75/hour loaded cost: $11,250/month in admin work

A tool that costs $99-500/month and eliminates most of that work pays for itself many times over. The real question isn't "can we afford this tool?" It's "can we afford not to use it?"


What mistakes should you avoid when choosing an AI automation tool?

The most common mistake is buying for features instead of outcomes. Revenue teams often choose the tool with the longest feature list, only to find that most features go unused. Focus on the 2-3 capabilities that directly address your bottleneck from Step 1.

Here are the mistakes we see most often:

1. Confusing activity logging with CRM automation. Many tools claim "CRM integration" but only log that a call happened. That's not automation—it's a timestamp. Ask for a live demo of field-level updates before buying.

2. Buying insight tools when you need automation. If your CRM data is stale because reps won't update it, a tool that gives reps more information to act on won't fix the problem. You need a tool that removes the manual step entirely.

3. Skipping the pilot. Demos are rehearsed. Pilots reveal real-world performance—audio quality issues, edge cases, integration bugs. Never commit to an annual contract without a 30-day proof of concept.

4. Ignoring total cost of ownership. A "free" tool that requires 10 hours of manual workarounds per week isn't free. A $500/month tool that saves 100 hours of admin work is a bargain.

5. Choosing for future scale instead of current needs. "We'll grow into it" is how teams waste budget on enterprise tools they're not ready for. Buy for where you are, not where you hope to be in two years.

Related: How to keep CRM data clean automatically


How does AskElephant fit into this checklist?

AskElephant is an AI Revenue Automation Platform that scores well on the criteria in this checklist: it writes directly to CRM fields (Step 3), integrates natively with HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoom, Teams, and Slack (Step 5), and starts at $99/month with no seat minimums (Step 7).

Here's how AskElephant maps to each evaluation step:

Checklist StepAskElephant
Bottleneck (Step 1)Built for post-call CRM updates, handoffs, and follow-ups
Insight vs. Automation (Step 2)Automation—writes to CRM, creates tasks, triggers workflows
CRM Depth (Step 3)Direct field updates including custom fields in HubSpot and Salesforce
Data Accuracy (Step 4)AI purpose-built for sales conversations
Stack Fit (Step 5)Native integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoom, Teams, Slack
Pilot (Step 6)No seat minimums—easy to pilot with a small team
TCO (Step 7)Starting at $99/month; saves 2-3 hours per rep per week

AskElephant serves 500+ revenue teams, is rated 4.9 on G2 and 5.0 on the HubSpot Marketplace with 200+ installs. Teams like Kixie and Rebuy use it to automate post-call workflows.

We built this checklist because we believe informed buyers make better decisions—and we're confident AskElephant performs well under scrutiny. If you want to test it against these criteria yourself, request a demo here.


Frequently asked questions


What's the complete checklist for choosing an AI tool?

Use this checklist before signing any contract to make sure you've covered every evaluation dimension.

  • Bottleneck defined — I know which manual task I'm solving
  • Insight vs. automation — I know whether I need analysis or action
  • CRM depth verified — The tool writes to custom fields, not just logs activities
  • Accuracy tested — AI output matches human judgment on 20-30 calls
  • Stack mapped — Native integrations with my CRM, video, calendar, and Slack
  • Pilot completed — 30-day proof of concept with measurable before/after data
  • TCO calculated — Total cost including implementation, training, and cost of inaction
  • Security confirmed — SOC2, HIPAA (if needed), data handling policies reviewed

What should you read next?

These related guides go deeper on specific CRM automation workflows and AI tool comparisons for revenue teams.


If you're evaluating AI workflow automation tools for your revenue team, you can request a demo here to see how AskElephant performs against this checklist.

About the Author

Woody is CEO & Co-founder at AskElephant, where he leads the company's vision for AI-powered revenue automation. Previously, he built and scaled revenue operations at multiple high-growth B2B companies.

Connect on LinkedIn →